On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Stefan Tibus wrote: > I wonder what the comparison would look like, if the system > was working with some standard load (on CPU and fs) while running > the actual fs-benchmark.
Hm, I'd have to create a *constant* workload for all tests, so that all filesystems are tested under the same conditions > Especially regarding the huge (90%+) > CPU-load imposed by ext3 when deleting files... Yes, the CPU load is indeed high, but the results are much highr too: in theory(!), if ext3 would only use 20% as the rest, it'd still come out with 6000 deletes/s, still higher than the rest. Do you/anybody know a better benchmark/procedure to test things like this? Thanks, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #182: endothermal recalibration ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
