On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 17:07 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > It looks like you got past this on your own. Thanks for all the > details. I think I know what the problem is, and I'll fix jfs_fsck > tomorrow.
> (I just found an older report which I think is the same trap, > that I said I would fix, and somehow I lost track of it over a year ago. > My bad!) I spoke too soon. I did fix that one. This one is different. I need to sanity check some more values that are based on data read from the journal. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
