On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 15:55 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> The comment above the function says one of its return value is -EIO,
> and also the caller of diAlloc() checks for -EIO:
>
> struct inode *ialloc(struct inode *parent, umode_t mode)
> {
> ...
> rc = diAlloc(parent, S_ISDIR(mode), inode);
> if (rc) {
> jfs_warn("ialloc: diAlloc returned %d!", rc);
> if (rc == -EIO)
> make_bad_inode(inode);
> ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c
> index 734ec91..d6363d8 100644
> --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c
> +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c
> @@ -1520,7 +1520,7 @@ int diAlloc(struct inode *pip, bool dir, struct inode
> *ip)
> jfs_error(ip->i_sb,
> "diAlloc: can't find free bit
> "
> "in wmap");
> - return EIO;
> + return -EIO;
> }
>
> /* determine the inode number within the
> -- 1.5.4.rc3
I'm not sure how this one escaped detection this long. I've added this
patch to the jfs git tree.
Thanks,
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
