Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Lucian Muresan wrote:
>> that's ok, really not a big problem, I can still use the older kernel
>> for a while, thanks for promptly answering.
> 
> In the report you were upgrading from 2.6.22 to 2.6.26, that's a big 
> step in for a linux kernel. Would it be possible for you to see if .23 
> or .25 is showing the same symptoms?

Unfortunately, not, as the 2.6.22 one was just the result of the efforts 
of some skilled http://buffalo.nas-central.org/ members who managed to 
port the buffallo-specific code from the 2.6.12 kernel which Buffalo had 
to release, and there was no other version based on that code ever 
since. The new implementation appeared only since version 2.6.25 (see 
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nico/orion.git;a=summary ) 
after Marvell, which is the hardware platform manufacturer/designer of 
the board used in the Buffalo Linkstation Pro and other NAS-es, decided 
to support themselves the whole platform (called orion5x). Well, 
actually Lennert (Cc-ed here) could correct me and elaborate more on this...

> Also, what's with the ATA errors at the end of your report:
> 
> ata2: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180000 action 0x6 frozen
> ata2: edma_err_cause=02000020 pp_flags=00000003, SError=00180000
> ata2: SError: { 10B8B Dispar }
> ata2: hard resetting link
> 
> Have you ruled out any (S)ATA related issues yet?

Well, not personally, but other Linkstaion Pro owners using the same 
2.6.26 kernel, but not using JFS partitions (just ext3), don't have such 
issues.

Lucian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to