Chris Leech wrote:
> Chris Leech wrote:
>> Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>>> @@ -62,7 +60,7 @@ struct timestruc_t {
>>> */
>>> typedef struct {
>>> unsigned len:24;
>>> - unsigned off1:8;
>>> + u8 off1;
>>> u32 off2;
>>> } lxd_t;
>> Shouldn't len here be changed to a __le24? I think this just changed
>> the size of lxd_t by a byte.
>
> Never mind, I see that it's a host order field. And presently surprised
> to see that gcc combines the 24-bit bitfield with the following u8.
>
> Chris
It does because these are all bytes. on x86. But this is not guarantied
for all ARCHs and machine-word-sizes. In any way this should be consistent
with the rest of the file.
Please see my other reply about packing of structures. If this is
on-the-wire then there are problems.
Boaz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
