On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Per Jessen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
>
> > About the same issue (the context of JFS not being actively
> > developed) I have a the following two questions:
> > * do the people on this list recommend using JFS for production
> > systems? (stability is the main concern, performance follows;)
>
> I do - I use it on all our systems, have been doing so since around JFS
> 1.1. I'm not sure about the total volume, but we're probably keeping
> towards 8Tb on JFS. If you take size as an positive indicator, look
> at these guys (they're using JFS):
>
>
> http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/
>
> I have always found it pretty odd when people take "not in active
> development" to mean they need to find something else to use.
>
>
I think JFS is missing at least one thing? (reaally really helpful to have).
Like when you accidentally delete stuff from a volume (I've done that!), it
would be nice to have a tool that could scan a volume, and try to piece the
file back together for you.
-jf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
