after 250df6ed274d767da844a5d9f05720b804240197
(fs: protect inode->i_state with inode->i_lock), insert_inode_locked()
no longer returns the inode with I_NEW set on failure.  However,
the error handler still calls unlock_new_inode() on failure,
which does a WARN_ON if I_NEW is not set, so any failure spews
a lot of warnings.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
---

diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c
index c1a3e60..7f464c5 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ struct inode *ialloc(struct inode *parent, umode_t mode)
 
        if (insert_inode_locked(inode) < 0) {
                rc = -EINVAL;
-               goto fail_unlock;
+               goto fail_put;
        }
 
        inode_init_owner(inode, parent, mode);
@@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ struct inode *ialloc(struct inode *parent, umode_t mode)
 fail_drop:
        dquot_drop(inode);
        inode->i_flags |= S_NOQUOTA;
-fail_unlock:
        clear_nlink(inode);
        unlock_new_inode(inode);
 fail_put:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of 
discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model 
of a cloud services business. Read Now!
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to