On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think this is a regression. It's been seen before, but the
> > patch never got submitted, or was lost somewhere. I believe this
> > will fix it.
>
> Hmm. This patch looks obviously correct. But it looks *so* obviously
> correct that it just makes me suspicious - this is not new or seldom
> used code, it's been this way for ages and used all the time. That
> line literally goes back to 2007, commit eb2be189317d0. And it looks
> like even before that we had a GFP_KERNEL for the add_to_page_cache()
> case and that goes back to before the git history. So this is
> *ancient*.
>
> Maybe almost nobody uses __read_cache_page() with a non-GFP_KERNEL gfp
> and as a result we've not noticed.
>
> Or maybe there is some crazy reason why it calls "add_to_page_cache()"
> with GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Adding the usual suspects for mm/filemap.c to the cc line (Andrew is
> already cc'd, but Al and Hugh should comment).
>
> Ack's, people? Is it really as obvious as it looks, and we've just had
> this bug forever?
Certainly
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
from me (and add_to_page_cache_locked does the masking of inappropriate
bits when passing on down, so no need to worry about that aspect).
I agree that it's odd that we've never noticed it before, but I don't
think the GFP_KERNEL there has any more significance than oversight.
Nick cleaned up some similar instances in filemap.c a few years back,
I guess ones he hit in testing, but this just got left over.
page_cache_read()'s GFP_KERNEL looks similarly worrying, but as it's
only called by filemap_fault(), I suppose it's actually okay.
Ooh, maybe you should also update that comment on GFP_KERNEL above
read_cache_page_gfp()...
Hugh
>
> Linus
>
> --- snip snip ---
> > vfs: __read_cache_page should use gfp argument rather than GFP_KERNEL
> >
> > lockdep reports a deadlock in jfs because a special inode's rw semaphore
> > is taken recursively. The mapping's gfp mask is GFP_NOFS, but is not used
> > when __read_cache_page() calls add_to_page_cache_lru().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> > index c106d3b..c9ea3df 100644
> > --- a/mm/filemap.c
> > +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> > @@ -1828,7 +1828,7 @@ repeat:
> > page = __page_cache_alloc(gfp | __GFP_COLD);
> > if (!page)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > - err = add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, index,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > + err = add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, index, gfp);
> > if (unlikely(err)) {
> > page_cache_release(page);
> > if (err == -EEXIST)------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
