On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 23:27:34 +0100 Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > A neater implementation might be to add a kmem_cache* argument to > > unregister_filesystem(). If that is non-NULL, unregister_filesystem() > > does the rcu_barrier() and destroys the cache. That way we get to > > delete (rather than add) a bunch of code from all filesystems and new > > and out-of-tree filesystems cannot forget to perform the rcu_barrier(). > > There's often enough more than one cache, so that one is no-go. kmem_cache** ;) Which filesystems have multiple inode caches? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
