On 08/10/2013 02:28 AM, Christian Kujau wrote: > Interesting stuff. Out of curiosity I just tried this myself, both client > & server are virtual machines running Debian/stable (3.2.0-4-amd64) and I > was able to reproduce this. A test case would be: >
I still haven't rebooted that machine - last chance to ask for any test info - as it looks like you have a test case anyway. I haven't lost any data that I know of - just programs complaining etc. IMO, at one time, jfs was really a better choice ( good set of tools). Even in a few cases where hardware failed the jfs tools worked well. Today with everyone banging on ext4 it has become the better choice. ( I don't think IBM is interested in supporting jfs - no idea if they are phasing out jfs2? ). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Karl Schmidt EMail [email protected] Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://secure.transtronics.com 3209 West 9th Street Ph (785) 841-3089 Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434 The world runs on individuals pursuing their separate interests. The great achievements of civilization have not come from government bureaus. Einstein didn’t construct his theory under order from a bureaucrat. Henry Ford didn’t revolutionize the automobile industry that way. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
