free_holes_block() passed local variable as a block pointer
to ext4_clear_blocks(). Thus ext4_clear_blocks() zeroed out this local
variable instead of proper place in inode / indirect block. We later
zero out proper place in inode / indirect block but don't dirty the
inode / buffer again which can lead to subtle issues (some changes e.g.
to inode can be lost).

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
---
 fs/ext4/indirect.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
index 8a57e9fcd1b9..9d381707a6fc 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
@@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@ static int free_hole_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct 
inode *inode,
                if (level == 0 ||
                    (bh && all_zeroes((__le32 *)bh->b_data,
                                      (__le32 *)bh->b_data + addr_per_block))) {
-                       ext4_free_data(handle, inode, parent_bh, &blk, &blk+1);
-                       *i_data = 0;
+                       ext4_free_data(handle, inode, parent_bh,
+                                      i_data, i_data + 1);
                }
                brelse(bh);
                bh = NULL;
-- 
1.8.1.4


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to