When DAX is enabled, it uses i_mmap_mutex as a protection against
truncate during page fault. This inevitably forces i_mmap_mutex to rank
outside of a transaction start and thus we have to avoid calling
pagecache purging operations when transaction is started.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 8a064734e6eb..494a8645d63e 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3631,13 +3631,19 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, 
loff_t length)
        if (IS_SYNC(inode))
                ext4_handle_sync(handle);
 
-       /* Now release the pages again to reduce race window */
+       inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);
+       ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
+       ext4_journal_stop(handle);
+
+       /*
+        * Now release the pages again to reduce race window. This has to happen
+        * outside of a transaction to avoid lock inversion on i_mmap_mutex
+        * when DAX is enabled.
+        */
        if (last_block_offset > first_block_offset)
                truncate_pagecache_range(inode, first_block_offset,
                                         last_block_offset);
-
-       inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);
-       ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
+       goto out_dio;
 out_stop:
        ext4_journal_stop(handle);
 out_dio:
-- 
1.8.1.4


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to