The error code should be negative. Since this ends up in the default case anyway, this is harmless, but it's less confusing to negate it. Also, later patches will require a negative error code here.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com> --- mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 27f7210e7fab..4b56e53e5378 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int me_pagecache_dirty(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn) * the first EIO, but we're not worse than other parts * of the kernel. */ - mapping_set_error(mapping, EIO); + mapping_set_error(mapping, -EIO); } return me_pagecache_clean(p, pfn); -- 2.9.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list Jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion