Now that writeback errors are handled on a per-file basis using the new
sequence counter method at the vfs layer, we no longer need to re-set
errors in the mapping after doing writeback in non-fsync codepaths.
Also, fix up some bogus comments.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com>
---
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 4 +---
fs/cifs/file.c | 7 ++-----
fs/cifs/inode.c | 22 +++++++---------------
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index dd3f5fabfdf6..017a2d1d02c7 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -829,10 +829,8 @@ static loff_t cifs_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t
offset, int whence)
if (!CIFS_CACHE_READ(CIFS_I(inode)) && inode->i_mapping &&
inode->i_mapping->nrpages != 0) {
rc = filemap_fdatawait(inode->i_mapping);
- if (rc) {
- mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, rc);
+ if (rc)
return rc;
- }
}
/*
* Some applications poll for the file length in this strange
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 0bee7f8d91ad..9825d892716e 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -722,9 +722,7 @@ cifs_reopen_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, bool can_flush)
cinode = CIFS_I(inode);
if (can_flush) {
- rc = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
- mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, rc);
-
+ filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
if (tcon->unix_ext)
rc = cifs_get_inode_info_unix(&inode, full_path,
inode->i_sb, xid);
@@ -3906,8 +3904,7 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
break_lease(inode, O_WRONLY);
rc = filemap_fdatawrite(inode->i_mapping);
if (!CIFS_CACHE_READ(cinode)) {
- rc = filemap_fdatawait(inode->i_mapping);
- mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, rc);
+ filemap_fdatawait(inode->i_mapping);
cifs_zap_mapping(inode);
}
cifs_dbg(FYI, "Oplock flush inode %p rc %d\n", inode, rc);
diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c
index b261db34103c..a58e605240fc 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -2008,10 +2008,8 @@ int cifs_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat
*stat,
if (!CIFS_CACHE_READ(CIFS_I(inode)) && inode->i_mapping &&
inode->i_mapping->nrpages != 0) {
rc = filemap_fdatawait(inode->i_mapping);
- if (rc) {
- mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, rc);
+ if (rc)
return rc;
- }
}
rc = cifs_revalidate_dentry_attr(dentry);
@@ -2171,15 +2169,12 @@ cifs_setattr_unix(struct dentry *direntry, struct iattr
*attrs)
* Attempt to flush data before changing attributes. We need to do
* this for ATTR_SIZE and ATTR_MTIME for sure, and if we change the
* ownership or mode then we may also need to do this. Here, we take
- * the safe way out and just do the flush on all setattr requests. If
- * the flush returns error, store it to report later and continue.
+ * the safe way out and just do the flush on all setattr requests.
*
* BB: This should be smarter. Why bother flushing pages that
- * will be truncated anyway? Also, should we error out here if
- * the flush returns error?
+ * will be truncated anyway?
*/
- rc = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
- mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, rc);
+ filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
rc = 0;
if (attrs->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
@@ -2314,15 +2309,12 @@ cifs_setattr_nounix(struct dentry *direntry, struct
iattr *attrs)
* Attempt to flush data before changing attributes. We need to do
* this for ATTR_SIZE and ATTR_MTIME for sure, and if we change the
* ownership or mode then we may also need to do this. Here, we take
- * the safe way out and just do the flush on all setattr requests. If
- * the flush returns error, store it to report later and continue.
+ * the safe way out and just do the flush on all setattr requests.
*
* BB: This should be smarter. Why bother flushing pages that
- * will be truncated anyway? Also, should we error out here if
- * the flush returns error?
+ * will be truncated anyway?
*/
- rc = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
- mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, rc);
+ filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
rc = 0;
if (attrs->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
--
2.9.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
