The error code should be negative. Since this ends up in the default
case anyway, this is harmless, but it's less confusing to negate it.
Also, later patches will require a negative error code here.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 27f7210e7fab..4b56e53e5378 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int me_pagecache_dirty(struct page *p, unsigned long
pfn)
* the first EIO, but we're not worse than other parts
* of the kernel.
*/
- mapping_set_error(mapping, EIO);
+ mapping_set_error(mapping, -EIO);
}
return me_pagecache_clean(p, pfn);
--
2.9.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
Jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
