Hi again,
a few days ago we noticed problems with problems with nfs-ing to one
of our machines, which is a DualPPro 200 running an 2.4.14 SMP
kernel and JFS-1.0.9. Today I found the messages below in the logs
on that machine, which fit with the time the problems began. Feeding
them into ksymoops I got lots of references to JFS. I don't know if
it is fixed in 1.0.10, but I thought that I could send it...
Greetings,
Peter.
ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.14. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.14/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map (specified)
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: invalid operand: 0000
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: CPU: 1
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: EIP: 0010:[<c905a160>] Not tainted
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: EFLAGS: 00010286
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: eax: 00000011 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000097 edx:
01000000
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: esi: c77cfe90 edi: 00000000 ebp: c77cff68 esp:
c77cfe6c
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: Process rpc.nfsd (pid: 166, stackpage=c77cf000)
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: Stack: c9070fb5 c90710e2 c77cff54 c77cff5c 00000000
c77cff68 00000000 00000000
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: 00000001 c77cfeb8 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000002 c77cff20 00017bc9
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: 00000000 c411003a 00000000 00023950 00000000
00000022 c6f9f3f0 c77cff5c
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: Call Trace: [<c9070fb5>] [<c90710e2>] [<c90625ef>]
[<c906c12c>] [<c9052d37>]
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: [<c013cb13>] [<c013cc19>] [<c0106d63>]
Dec 10 10:42:27 machine kernel: Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 08 8b 54 24 1c 8b 1a 8b 72 04 8b 42
0c 89 44 24
>>EIP; c905a160 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7ba/336aa> <=====
Trace; c9070fb5 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+3360f/336aa>
Trace; c90710e2 <[sunrpc].text.start+92/168>
Trace; c90625ef <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+24c49/336aa>
Trace; c906c12c <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+2e786/336aa>
Trace; c9052d37 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+15391/336aa>
Trace; c013cb13 <vfs_unlink+10f/16c>
Trace; c013cc19 <sys_unlink+a9/120>
Trace; c0106d63 <system_call+2f/34>
Code; c905a160 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7ba/336aa>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code; c905a160 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7ba/336aa> <=====
0: 0f 0b ud2a <=====
Code; c905a162 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7bc/336aa>
2: 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%esp
Code; c905a165 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7bf/336aa>
5: 8b 54 24 1c mov 0x1c(%esp,1),%edx
Code; c905a169 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7c3/336aa>
9: 8b 1a mov (%edx),%ebx
Code; c905a16b <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7c5/336aa>
b: 8b 72 04 mov 0x4(%edx),%esi
Code; c905a16e <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7c8/336aa>
e: 8b 42 0c mov 0xc(%edx),%eax
Code; c905a171 <[jfs]__module_kernel_version+1c7cb/336aa>
11: 89 44 24 00 mov %eax,0x0(%esp,1)
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
