On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 17:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear Dave Kleikamp, > > yes, the directory exists, but trying to list it's > contents (after having provoked the find-error before) > first caused an instant 99% CPUcycle, then after strace-tests > listing the directory worked just fine!
Well, until I get fsck to properly create lost+found, it's working as designed (aside from the out-of-memory problems and trap). When the kernel code detects that the directory index metadata is missing, it creates it as needed. Apparently, this code is not very efficient. This is where I suspected I'd find the bug you reported yesterday. > > Best Regards > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
