On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 21:39, Paul Lanier wrote: > I had both segfaults. The patch fixed the Phase 1 segfault but not the > Phase 0 problem. I've attached a gdb log with a stack backtrace. Let > me know if that's not what you wanted. I tried to compile jfsutils with > debug info but that stack trace still doesn't look very useful so maybe > I didn't set it up right.
That's what I wanted, but it's not very helpful. I'm afraid I don't have a lot of time to try to get this debugged. I'm about to leave on a two-week vacation. > I was able to mount the drive in readonly mode (didn't think to try that > before). I think I'll just get what I need off and re-format it. Let > me know if you want another trace before I get rid of it. After recovering what you can, you can try to run "fsck.jfs --omit_journal_replay". This will try to fix everything up without replaying the journal. This may potentially cause a lot of files and directories to be tossed out, so it's a good idea to recover anything important first. -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
