On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 22:02 +0100, Gilles Meier wrote: > Nothing to do, always the same error :( > > Isn't there some method to "repair" the superblocks with jfs_debug or > some other utility ?
I would guess that if the partition table could be fixed, there shouldn't be a need to repair the superblocks. I'm not sure that they are being read from the right location. I would hope that nothing overwrote both superblocks. If something had, the file system may be beyond recovery. > > If I've all understood, the only thing who was messed up is the > partition table, so datas are always on the hdd... I don't have any idea > on how information are organised in partition table, but can't I > discover data location with the journal or something else ? > (parted) rescue > Start? 0.000 > End? 238475.179 > Information: A jfs primary partition was found at 0.000Mb -> > 238433.211Mb. Do you want to add it to the partition table? > Yes/No/Cancel? N My guess is that this is a remnant of running mkfs.jfs against /dev/hdd. I would ingore this one. > Information: A jfs primary partition was found at 0.028Mb -> > 238433.238Mb. Do you want to add it to the partition table? > Yes/No/Cancel? N This is probably the correct location. Did you try to rescue the disk using this partition, and then reboot? If you did, and still get the error from fsck, run jfs_debugfs /dev/hdd1, then the subcommands "sup" and "sup s". > Tanks a lot for your help, it's good to talk with kind people :) I try to help out when I can. I'm not sure if my help is going to do you any good though, but we can try. -- Dave Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
