jfs does have some performance issues on disks that don't do write-caching. dbench really seems to illustrate this problem. I'm working with our performance team to try to come up with some improvements. We're hoping to have something ready before the holidays.
Thanks, Shaggy On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 10:14 +0100, Bjoern JACKE wrote: > Hi Shaggy, > > Tridge did some EA filesystem benchmarks to find out about good > filesystems for Samba4. You can find the results on > http://samba.org/~tridge/xattr_results/. JFS performs very poor here > with 2.6.10rc kernel; I can remember ACL fs benchmarks from Andreas > Gr�nbacher, which showed quite good performance for JFS with 2.4.x > kernel. Maybe you want to have a look at it and see why JFS is so poor > here. > > Bjoern -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
