On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 17:50 -0600, Jon Nelson wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > If you have CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ defined, you could 'echo t > > > /proc/sysrq-trigger' and send me the dmesg output. (Please don't cc > > the mailing list) > > I don't know what could be private in these files, but if there is > just let me know.
Nothing private. I wasn't sure how big the files would be and didn't think it was necessary to spam everyone on the list with large attachments. > Included are two files: x, and y. > > x is taken while in runlevel 5, right after the hang. > y is taken while in runlevel 1, also after the hang. > > I thought that perhaps y might help narrow things down for you. It looks like the same hang as before. I actually was optimistic that changing the low-water mark would fix the problem. That would have changed the numbers back to about what they have previously been before an earlier change, and I didn't recall having seen this hang before. Upon further reflection, though, our performance team had some problems before that required them to increase the number of tlocks, so I will have to come up with a more complete solution. -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
