On Tue, Feb  2, 2016 at 08:49 pm, Kimsan <[email protected]> wrote:
Hahaha. How was Adrians comment, nasty?  It was a suggestion.

 Kimsan,

               I took it upon myself, entirely of my own volition, to take up 
the cause of accessibility issues with this particular test document with 
AccuPlacer, and started the process of trying to get them to look at it and 
update it in December, when this thread started.  I have continued to have back 
and forth contact with them when it appeared that the ball had been dropped.  
Finally, after several months effort, I received a direct reply from them that 
included an updated file that they claimed was accessible.

              When I posted that information here and gave what I'd hoped would 
be a workable link to said file, I stated, "if you'd like to play with it to 
see how accessible it actually is."

              I am not a screen-reader user, day in and day out, so I am really 
not in the position to make any sort of accurate assessment as to whether a 
given piece of material is actually accessible or not.  I threw this out there 
to the cohort hoping that a few people might be curious enough to actually 
"play with it to see how accessible it actually is."  You all would be the 
experts on this particular piece of the puzzle, not I.

              I never once "recommended" this document to anyone.  I've gone to 
a lot of effort because I actually cared enough to do so.  I made clear that 
this was the result offered to me and that others should have a look.  Getting 
condescending comments in light of all that is pretty nasty and offensive, at 
least to me.

              If anyone wants to take up the effort of looking at this file in 
whatever versions of JAWS they have, and offering feedback to the folks at 
AccuPlacer, it appears that they'd value that.  I sent an e-mail a short while 
ago to them outlining that issues had already been identified by screen-reader 
users and received the following response:

---------------------------------------------------------------

Hello Brian,

Thank you for contacting ACCUPLACER Customer Support.
We are sorry to hear that your experience with ACCUPLACER and JAWS has been 
disappointing and less than you expected up to this point.  If you could 
provide us with as much detailed information as possible about each of the 
issues you found, we will work with our development team and the third party 
vendor to address your concerns as quickly as possible.

Please let us know if you need additional assistance.

Thank you,
Thomas
ACCUPLACER Customer Support
[email protected] 
1-866-607-5223

---------------------------------------------------------------

The e-mail address that I've been using to contact them on this matter, which 
will be trimmed for forums users, is accuplacer at support dot pearson dot com.

At this point I'm simply bowing out, at least in public and on the forum about 
this issue.  It seems that I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't.  And I'll 
be damned if I'm going to put myself in that position ongoing.

Brian

Reply via email to