Hi to the List,
Dave is right.
By the way, I did suggest that a large organization that did not own
JAWS buy it for themselves so that it could be aware of the benefits of JAWS
software in future dealings with blind people.
Although the price is high, I hope that many more will buy JAWS. That
is why it really concerns me that certain features currently in JAWS would
make it harder users of enlargement software to also use JAWS. Now the pool
of large print users is huge and if they bought JAWS, more copies would be
sold--increasing monies for research and development of better JAWS.
To some degree, the more users of JAWS--whether they use only speech or
combine it with an enlarging print software--the greater funding available
for more features for JAWS. So i do agree with Dave's points. We should
spread the word.
I am also concerned about problems with JAWS reading columns on web
pages. I never want this fine software to lose out to any other in terms of
reading web pages.Can some one explain why JAWS slices through columns in
web pages and why that has not been corrected?
This software is really useful; i just think a good thing can be better,
and i continue to mention JAWS to other blind people. Thanks, Dave.for
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw
