Les, I am surprised that nobody has writen a reply to author script for
outlook. I have been hearing about outlook, outlook express, and outlook
98, and outlook 2000. What's the difference between all of them?
At 11:51 AM 10/17/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Walter,
>
>Well, I switched to Outlook, because we are going to it at work. I will
>tell you that I have been dissatisfied with Eudora ever since JFW 3.3 came
>out, at least on my home system. At work, running Eudora 4.1 and JFW 3.3,
>for some reason it works better. Outlook is quite responsive with JFW. I
>think you are correct when you state that HJ has worked hard on access to
>Outlook. It's a Microsoft product, and therefore, perceived, in my opinion,
>to be used more by people at work. I believe HJ has put a lot of effort
>into what they perceive to be work-based applications, at least in the
>recent past. I'm not suggesting that HJ has no interest in the home-based
>user, but I have read that they have working relationships with the Social
>Security Administration and Citibank, to name a couple, and that leads me to
>this conclusion. It's not a condemnation of HJ, just a statement of where I
>believe their biases are, and everybody hcertainly has those. Anyway, I
>think you can learn Outlook if you wish to. Setting up rules, the
>equivalent of filters in Eudora, is more complex in Outlook, and of course,
>Eudora has the reply to author script which Outlook does not have. Outlook
>98 has a calendar and other features, Outlook Express is primarily for
>e-mail and news group reading. If you decide to go to Outlook 98, I'll be
>glad to assist if I can.
>Best Regards,
>
>Les
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
Walter
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
