Linda, if you had one upgrade, your number was there and now if you look,
you should not have any upgrades left.
Leonard
----- Original Message -----
From: Linda Parent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 3:07 PM
Subject: RE: the case of the missing serial number
> Hi,
>
> I thought it was my imagination. The serial number list this time is not
> right or something. The first one was 15 something and then it seems to
go
> to four-digit numbers and back to five digits. I installed the beta
> thinking my number was there because it was on the previous lists for
these
> upgrades and I had one upgrade remaining so now I have installed it with
my
> number apparently not being there and I'm not sure what to do. I had no
> trouble installing it at all so the question is should I uninstall it?
>
> Linda Parent
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sarah anson
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 1:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: the case of the missing serial number
>
>
> letely agree. What's also a pain is that the serial munbers aren't in
order.
> I can't quite use the find command so looking thru all them not to find
your
> numbeer was quite the waste if time.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Csercsics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, December 23, 1999 12:31 PM
> Subject: Re: the case of the missing serial number
>
>
> >Yeah I'll agree with you jJeff, this is the worst behaviour I have ever
> seen
> >from ANY company. I would like to know what the idea is behind some of
HJ's
> >policies particularly the "public beta" definition! This doesn't make
any
> >sense to me at all!
> >Dave Csercsics,
> >Simba or Zemballa on irc,
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Jeff Paget" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 7:15 AM
> >Subject: Re: the case of the missing serial number
> >
> >
> >> Hi Everyone,
> >>
> >> Quotes on.
> >> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Dale Reardon wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have the same problem. Who is meant to be able to use the program?
> A
> >> > very strange use of the word public beta. When other companies
release
> >> > public betas that means the whole public can use it.
> >> Quotes off.
> >>
> >> A "public beta" release of a program is supposed to give everyone
> >> who has an interest in a program a chance to evaluate and comment
> >> on a forthcomming release, obviously this is not the intent from
> >> Henter Joyce.
> >>
> >> By limiting the release to those who have still have "upgrade"
> >> status no-one with a previous release will be able to update
> >> their earlier version without first paying another fee.
> >>
> >> If Ted Henter deserves an award for this sort of behaviour I'll
> >> start believing in the tooth fairy.
> >>
> >> Regards Jeff
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
> >>
> >
> >-
> >Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
> >
> >
>
> -
> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
> -
> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
