Arguably, one can blame an aggressive psyche of the people. Even dismiss it
'hot-blooded' sub-continental temperament to the raging Celsius heat. But
how should one read the unprecedented four incidents of 'shoe-cide attacks'
by the aam aadmi on our much-venerated and powerful netagan which are
resonating across electoral India? Overtaking the traditional mud-slinging
attacks and replacing them with the smelly and 'slippery' shoes.



Can one simply shrug off the journalist hurling his shoe at Union Home
Minister Chidambaram by stating we are gripped by the US 'me-too' syndrome?
Remember, it all started when an angry Iraqi journalist hurled his shoe at
the former US President Bush on his 'thank you' visit to Baghdad. Or view
the other three cases it as disgruntled partymen denied tickets throwing
their slippers at BJP's Prime Minister-in-waiting Advani,
industrialist-turned-politico Naveen Jindal and fading Bollywood star
Jitendra campaigning for a politician.



Importantly, it's all this and much more. It is a sign of a maturing and
assertive electorate demanding answers from its leaders in an evolving
democracy. Yet another sign of the increasing unrest among the people
against their 'nikamma' leaders and moribund institutions, run like personal
fiefdoms, corrupt, callous with an undercurrent of might is right. A symbol
of the janata's anger, contempt, disgust and revulsion against the misrule
by our polity.



That the shoes were hurled at leaders, who are not the usual
criminal-politicos riding the crest of money and muscle power or the cow
belt's Made in India netas is a pointer that the people's patience is
running out--and fast.



More important, it exposes the wide chasm between the aam aadmi and our
netas. And the increasing frustration and disconnect over the vandalisation
of institutions by the so-called jan sevaks. Especially against the
distorted Orwellian concept of democracy in vogue: Some are more equal than
the others, read politicians and babudom.



That our poverty-stricken bare-footed poor for whom the innocuous footwear
is not only a luxury but something to be venerated and worshiped should
resort to chappal se maroonga tactics speaks of their desperation for a
better deal, accountability and good governance.



According to folklore the slipper has been a symbol of worship over
centuries. Remember, Bharat in the Ramayana, who kept his brother Ram's
'khadaoin' on the throne when he was banished for 14 years and ruled Ayodhya
as his Regent. In villages, homes have carvings of saintly 'khadaoin' on
their front doors to revere saints and Gods they worshiped.



Besides, the shoe serves the all-important purpose of keeping one's feet
clean amidst the filth and dirt of day-to-day living. In aam homes (those
not invaded by western concept) the tradition is to take off one's footwear
before entering the house to keep the muck outside.



In addition, the chappal is used as an expletive of contempt, disrespect,
frustration and a powerful missile to express angst. More than physical
pain, it serves as a censure, heaps scorn and hurts the ego of the one hit
by the footwear. Recall, in 2006, a village in Andhra Pradesh took recourse
to the chappal se maroonga syndrome to make drinking husbands fall in line.
Wherein the villagers decided that a wife would beat her husband with her
chappal and the man would pay her Rs.5,000. This resulted in the incidents
of drinking drastically coming down.



Needless to say, the journalist-shoe aimed at Chidambaram served its purpose
whereby the Congress replaced two candidates to assuage the anger and hurt
of the Sikh community demanding justice for the 1984 riots that saw 3000
Sikhs killed and burnt alive. For the other three shoes-slinging incidents,
the leaders chose to adopt the policy of forgive and forget. No matter, this
had more to do with showcasing a smile during polls than being seen as a
rigid unforgiving party-pooper.



Notwithstanding, the hullabaloo about Shoegate, it is no different from
other forms of public anger displayed in Imphal and Bhubaneswar a few years
ago, when angry students gheraoed the respective State Assemblies and
refused to let the MLAs' out. Both demonstrating their disgust against the
State Government's misrule and its policies of fanning communal fires.



What to speak of the increasing dharnas against various Governmental
departments, beating-up of officials by an irate public, doctors and other
professionals protests against the sarkari reservation policy etc. Or the
citizens' candlelight vigils post 26/11 in Mumbai to last week's students'
protest against an elitist public school apathy which led to the death of a
17-year-old girl in the Union Capital. All pointers that the people's
fortitude is running out.



Sadly, however, our netas refuse to see the signs. Instead of going in for a
course correction, they take the easy way out by arresting the protestors
and chappal throwers. Yet, when it comes to themselves they apply a
different yardstick. Sure, they do protest. Instances are aplenty of
paper-weights being hurled by MPs and MLAs at the Speakers of their
respective Houses, microphones being ripped and used to hit opponents,
fist-fights in full public view et al.



But what is their rage about? Their own incompetence and scoring points
against their rivals. What action is taken? Zilch. Why doesn't the same rule
of law apply to them? Why are they not hauled up or put behind bars? Simply
because they are above the law and rule by law. Brazen double standards.



Is this what our democracy is all about? Where the 'more equals' play havoc
with the janata and get away with it. At best a feudal democracy and at
worst an autocratic republic which refuses to take criticism in its stride.
Sadly, instead of addressing the issues raised by the Shoe-cides, trust our
netagan to further 'barricade' themselves against public anger by asking for
more security and erecting metal nets at rallies.



Not a few leaders want shoes to be scrutinized now. Does that mean the
rent-a-crowd would have to attend public functions sans the shoe? Or will
special cushioned shoes be provided? Already an enterprising person has
launched a juta phenko (hurl the shoe) training campaign. Ostensibly, aimed
at helping future shoe-chuckers hit the target.



We are in an era where the society is slowly shaking off its jo hukam
mentality. No longer is it scared of being pulverized for daring to speak
up. Put it down to affirmative action, TV and telecom connectivity. Clearly,
if our leaders do not learn from these shoe-sole incidents it holds out
ominous portends for India's democracy wherein hurling footwear will not
become the exception but the rule.



Poonam I Kaushish, INFA



http://www.centralchronicle.com/viewnews.asp?articleID=5965


-- 
Regards,

Sudesh Kumar
J H A R K H A N D
[email protected]

Reply via email to