[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-39?page=history ]
Dennis Sosnoski resolved JIBX-39:
---------------------------------
Fix Version: CVS
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Dennis Sosnoski (was: Cameron Taggart)
Fixed, with Cameron's help.
> remove simple collection wrapper objects
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: JIBX-39
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-39
> Project: JiBX
> Type: Improvement
> Components: xsd2jibx
> Versions: xsd2jibx 0.1, xsd2jibx 0.2
> Reporter: Cameron Taggart
> Assignee: Dennis Sosnoski
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: CVS
>
>
> Unnecessary objects get created in a common situation like this. It could be
> simplified. Instead of having an object named "ArrayOfAccountInfo", an
> actual array could be inserted in the location.
> From a user:
> <s:complexType name="ArrayOfAccountInfo">
> <s:sequence>
> <s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" name="AccountInfo"
> nillable="true" type="s1:AccountInfo" />
> </s:sequence>
> </s:complexType>
> this creates a separate class. I understand the why of this, but I'm
> wondering if there's a better solution for this common type of schema
> construct (like just sticking an array or ArrayList in directly at the point
> of use, rather than a reference to this class which is just a holder for the
> ArrayList).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
jibx-devs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-devs