[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=137686#action_137686
]
Dennis Sosnoski commented on JIBX-215:
--------------------------------------
It's still my plan to support alternatives to bytecode enhancement in 2.0. I'm
hoping to have the first beta release of 2.0 out later this year, but the
scheduling really depends a lot on what my commercial clients want.
> Option to work without binding compiler
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: JIBX-215
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-215
> Project: JiBX
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Zbigniew Malec
> Priority: Blocker
>
> Right now JiBX is rather intrusive. Bytecode enchancement is not an option
> in my case so I cannot use JiBX. If there was an option to separate
> marshalling logic from actual classes that would make JiBX even more robust
> and acceptable in application similar to mine. The way to go could be using
> reflexion (would allow to use private members also) or externally generated
> classes for bindings (as source code or in runtime).
> I read somewhere that you planned on implementing this kind of functionality
> in JiBX 2.0, although it is written that this version was scheduled to be in
> October 2007... Is there any chance that JiBX will support non intrusive
> marshalling/unmarshalling?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
jibx-devs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-devs
