[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dennis Sosnoski updated JIBX-244:
---------------------------------
Assignee: Dennis Sosnoski
Description:
Originally, we had the small and larger POJOs in the same package. But we had
to refactor this, moving the small POJO's to another package, say
com.base.package. But JIBX is not happy with this. If I create jibx-mappings
in that com.base.package, how can I refer to them from the jibx-bindings in my
other package?
I think this is not possible with the current JIBX, which is why I'm creating
an issue here.
For us, this issue is important, as this could be an argument for having to
drop jibx altogether.
Kind regards,
Nancy
was:
Originally, we had the small and larger POJOs in the same package. But we had
to refactor this, moving the small POJO's to another package, say
com.base.package. But JIBX is not happy with this. If I create jibx-mappings
in that com.base.package, how can I refer to them from the jibx-bindings in my
other package?
I think this is not possible with the current JIBX, which is why I'm creating
an issue here.
For us, this issue is important, as this could be an argument for having to
drop jibx altogether.
Kind regards,
Nancy
You want to <include> the binding for the com.base.package in the other
binding. You can either compile them both at the same time, or precompile the
com.base.package bindings if that's more convenient. See the precompiled
binding feature of JiBX 1.2:
http://jibx.sourceforge.net/binding/precompiled.html
> Reusing previously bound classes (in other package)
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JIBX-244
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-244
> Project: JiBX
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: JiBX 1.1.6
> Environment: Maven, several modules
> Reporter: Nancy Mazur
> Assignee: Dennis Sosnoski
> Fix For: JiBX 1.2
>
>
> Originally, we had the small and larger POJOs in the same package. But we had
> to refactor this, moving the small POJO's to another package, say
> com.base.package. But JIBX is not happy with this. If I create jibx-mappings
> in that com.base.package, how can I refer to them from the jibx-bindings in
> my other package?
> I think this is not possible with the current JIBX, which is why I'm creating
> an issue here.
> For us, this issue is important, as this could be an argument for having to
> drop jibx altogether.
> Kind regards,
> Nancy
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
jibx-devs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-devs
