[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=265745#action_265745
 ] 

Archie Cobbs commented on JIBX-437:
-----------------------------------

OK, now I realize I think this is happening not because of a namespace conflict 
but because both namespaces have {{default="elements"}}. I guess JiBX 1.2.2 
simply didn't detect this problem.

Sorry for the noise, please mark this issue INVALID.


> Conflicting element namespaces error incorrectly reported
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JIBX-437
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-437
>             Project: JiBX
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: JiBX 1.2.3
>            Reporter: Archie Cobbs
>             Fix For: JiBX 1.2.3
>
>
> When trying to compile this binding:
> {noformat}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
> <!-- $Id: status.xml 6 2010-09-28 22:07:31Z archie.cobbs $ -->
> <binding package="org.dellroad.jibxbindings.pidf"
>   xmlns:pidf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
>   xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10">
>     <include path="lo/geoPriv.xml"/>
>     <mapping abstract="true" type-name="pidf:status" 
> class="org.dellroad.jibxbindings.pidf.Status">
>         <namespace uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" default="elements" 
> prefix="pidf"/>
>         <namespace uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10" 
> default="elements" prefix="gp"/>
>         <value name="basic" ns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" field="basic" 
> usage="optional" enum-value-method="getXMLValue"/>
>         <structure name="geopriv" ns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10" 
> field="geoPriv" map-as="gp:geopriv" usage="optional"/>
>     </mapping>
> </binding>
> {noformat}
> JiBX generates this error:
> {noformat}
> Error: Conflicting element namespaces; on namespace element at (line 10, col 
> 96, in status.xml)
> {noformat}
> The error is incorrect: the two namespaces have different prefixes. Therefore 
> this is a bug.
> This bug does *not* occur in JiBX 1.2.2.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
jibx-devs mailing list
jibx-devs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-devs

Reply via email to