Re: [jibx-users] Working with collections

[Dennis Sosnoski]

That's a limitation of the current code, mentioned on the status page. 
For right now, the easiest work-around is probably to just add an add() 
method to the containing object for unmarshalling (along with size() and 
get() methods, if you're also marshalling).

 - Dennis

Guillaume Pothier wrote:

Hi, I have another question. I have a class that has a field of type 
java.util.List. The field is initialized in its declaration:
class Foo
{
	private List itsUsers = new ArrayList ();
	(...)
}

When processing the bindings, JiBX fails saying that a no-args 
constructor is needed for class java.util.List (full stack trace below). 
Replacing List by ArrayList solves my problem, however I do not want to 
do that. Is there a way to tell to the <collection> tag not to 
instantiate the collection?
Guillau,e

 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users