I missed that I should had checked out the last CVS, sorry.
I tried it and at least the set-method trick works! Thanks a lot. We will try the formatter too, which is a bit cleaner.
Just one small issue: checking out the jibx module and running the build script, ant complains that it cannot find a custom task.
Stefano
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
You shouldn't need a dedicated class with the corrected CVS code, just the test/get/set methods.
Handling this may get simpler with the beta 4 code generation changes. It's kind of an odd case for data binding, though - not really binding to any value, just to a presence flag.
- Dennis
Stefano Fornari wrote:
Hi Dennis,
thanks for this. Honestly I do not like that approach. I had to map the tag with a structure to a dedicated class instead of a simple boolean or Boolean. What I would like to see is a better support directly in the jibx mapping/runtime.
Thanks again. Stefano
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
Hi Stefano,
See my "Re: [jibx-users] Map empty element to boolean" message, just sent. This approach still requires a little extra code, but at least it works. Does that fit your needs?
- Dennis
-- Stefano Fornari [EMAIL PROTECTED] Funambol CTO www.funambol.com
6472 Camden Ave #106 Via dei Valtorta 21 San Jose, CA 95120 (USA) 20127 Milano (Italy) Tel.: +1 408 705 2044 Tel.: +39 02 2614 5383 Fax: +1 408 705 2044 Fax: +39 02 7005 60230
Your Synchronization Company
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
