If the documents mix the two forms you might still be able to do something with subclasses, though this would get ugly - you'd basically need to define subclasses of your sync4j.framework.core.SyncML and map them separately, one using namespaces and the other not. If the child elements of the SyncML element are always non-namespaced you can just use an abstract base mapping that handles all the details.
Hope these suggestions help,
- Dennis
Luigia Fassina wrote:
Hi,
How can I make JiBX ignoring a tag namespace?
In the binding.xml I have declared
<mapping name="SyncML" ns="syncml:syncml1.0" class="sync4j.framework.core.SyncML">
<structure field="header"/>
<structure field="body"/>
</mapping>
The problem is that not all the XML documents will explicity specify the namespace.
If the xml message has tag <SyncML> and not <SyncML xmlns="syncml:syncml1.0"> JiBX throws an Unmarshall Exception!!
I want that the tag <SyncML> is obligatory but not the declaration of namespace.
Thanks in advance
Luigia
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
