I think I got it. Pretty simple one.
It was just another ant task issue. Basically I have to give fully qualified package 
namw where the files will be generated.

Thanks
Sudhi

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 6:45 PM
To: Sudhendra Seshachala
Subject: Re: [jibx-users] Question of Compile time bindings and runtimebindigs


No, these should be automatic. If you can send me your binding 
definition file, the actual command you're using to run the binding 
compiler, and a zip file of the classes in your package after running 
the binding compiler I'll try to track down what's going wrong. Normally 
the name of your binding factory class is not going to be such a long 
string, so I think something strange is happening.

- Dennis

Sudhendra Seshachala wrote:

>Do I need to set any property before compiling bindings to generate 
>*bindingFactory.class and *MungeAdapter.class ?
>
>Thanks
>Sudhi
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sudhendra Seshachala
>Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 4:21 PM
>To: 'Dennis Sosnoski'
>Subject: RE: [jibx-users] Question of Compile time bindings and runtimebindigs
>
>When I investigated the jar file and also compilation the following 
>file is not getting generated 
>"JiBX_hawaii_stcdbeway_repository_src_java_com_stc_stcdbeway_repository_impl_StcdbDatabaseModel_bindingFactory"
>I believe this is what is causing the issue
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 4:14 PM
>To: Sudhendra Seshachala
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [jibx-users] Question of Compile time bindings and runtimebindigs
>
>Oh, I'm sorry - I thought (partially from the subject line) that you
>were using the runtime binding support. After reading it through again I 
>see that's not the case at all.
>
>I don't know what *is* happening in this case, unless you've actually
>got two sets of your class files in the class path and you're picking up 
>the wrong set (the ones that haven't had the binding compiler run on 
>them). That seems the most likely cause, if you're sure the JiBX files 
>are included in the jar file. Please double-check this issue.
>
>If you can't find a problem with the classpath, send me (directly) the
>jar file and I'll try it here.
>
>- Dennis
>
>Sudhendra Seshachala wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I did follow the following steps
>>I compile my java classes
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>Run JiBX binding compiler
>>>>
>>>>Jar all the classes including the generated files.
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 3:36 PM
>>To: Sudhendra Seshachala
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: [jibx-users] Question of Compile time bindings and
>>runtimebindigs
>>
>>The workaround is to do the binding at build time, before the class
>>files are converted into a jar. This is the recommended way of doing 
>>things anyway, since it avoids the overhead of processing the binding 
>>definition every time you start up your program. The runtime binding is 
>>really intended more for debugging than anything else.
>>
>>I just checked Jira and didn't have any problem. You do need to 
>>register
>>
>>before you can add an issue, though.
>>
>> - Dennis
>>
>>Sudhendra Seshachala wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Is there a workaround to resolve this ?
>>>We have started using this rocking framework and now we ran into this
>>>issue. 
>>>Let me know if I can be of any help in implementing this stuff. 
>>>
>>>PS I could not open a issue on jira. Its kind of down I think ?
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>Sudhi
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:53 PM
>>>To: Sudhendra Seshachala
>>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Subject: Re: [jibx-users] Question of Compile time bindings and
>>>runtimebindigs
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>From the description of the runtime binding at
>>    
>>
>>>http://jibx.sourceforge.net/bindonload.html: "At present, runtime
>>>binding only works with classes that are present in the classpath as 
>>>individual class files (not in jars)." This really should not be a 
>>>requirement for the runtime binding, but works that way because the 
>>>build-time binding compiler came first and the runtime binding was
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>built
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>on top of it. It is something I'd like to change for the future, and 
>>>if
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>you want to enter it as an issue in the Jira system I'll try to get
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>this
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>fixed for beta 4.
>>>
>>>- Dennis
>>>
>>>Sudhendra Seshachala wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I have been working on jibx for past 4- 5 days in basically to use
>>>>jibx framework our marshalling and unmarshalling of XML-java objects
>>>>
>>>>Since we are already ahead in development, I am just defining
>>>>binding.xml for our java objects and we have test xml files through 
>>>>which we are able to test Roundtripping.
>>>>
>>>>This is fine when we have all java class files "not" part of jar.
>>>>
>>>>The way I do is as follows
>>>>
>>>>I compile my java classes
>>>>
>>>>Run JiBX binding compiler
>>>>
>>>>Jar all the classes including the generated files.
>>>>
>>>>During runtime when I try testing with org.jibx.extras.TestRoundtrip 
>>>>I ...
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
>>Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 
>>10g.
>>Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
>>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&opĚk
>>_______________________________________________
>>jibx-users mailing list
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

-- 
Dennis M. Sosnoski
Enterprise Java, XML, and Web Services
Training and Consulting
http://www.sosnoski.com
Redmond, WA  425.885.7197




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users

Reply via email to