Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
If you want to override [...]Thanks for this. I will go for it.
If you know this data contains binary values, you really should use base64 encoding on it. I've been meaning to add a standard serializer/deserializer for base64 to the Utilities class and make this the default for byte[]. Would that suit your needs?Unfortunately it does not. We I can, I definitely encode things (I have my base64 encoder). But I have to deal with Phones which produce the most orrible rubbish you can imagine :) And it is completely out of my control. For this reason I need as much flexibility as possible.
What I may suggest is not to chose something such as a parser and make it mandatory. Let things pluggable and configurable.
Regards, Stefano
-- Stefano Fornari [EMAIL PROTECTED] Funambol CTO www.funambol.com
6472 Camden Ave #106 Via dei Valtorta 21 San Jose, CA 95120 (USA) 20127 Milano (Italy) Tel.: +1 408 705 2044 Tel.: +39 02 2614 5383 Fax: +1 408 705 2044 Fax: +39 02 7005 60230
Your Synchronization Company
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
