Hi guys, I've seen in the docs that I can specify that values contained within a <structure> element can be set to be marshalled into attributes in the resulting xml doc, like below:
<mapping class="..." name="parent" ... > <structure name="child" field="..." value-style="attribute"/> </mapping> However, that is a bit limiting, because it implies that the <structure> must be a child member of a class - the <mapping> element in the binding definition. Is there a way to define that <value> elements within a <mapping> will be marshalled into attributes in the resulting xml ? Something like: <mapping class="..." name="child" ... > <value name=".." field="..." value-style="attribute"/> </mapping> That would bring down the total xml size, and allow me to use the "child" class both as a contained member of the "parent" class, as well as an independent class and use it on it's own. Is this supported ? Perhaps I mis-read something in the documentation ? Cheers, Angel O:] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
