Hi, For marshalling binding. Is it possible to have one binding but have mutliple <mapping>s for one class and somehow switch mappings along the way?
I notice that the best practice is to use <structures> instead of overusing <bindings> but I have an Object reference that I would like to have it's type be determined at runtime by using <mappings> and defining a mapping for the possible class that can be referenced by the Object reference. The problem is, I might want to marshall that item-type say class A differently(some fields are not used) but all defined in one binding? Any Ideas? Thanks, Felix --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
