That doesn't mean that RelaxNG support (including perhaps embedding the binding definition directly into the grammar) isn't worth pursuing, though. The binding definition model code is implemented and fairly well tested at this point, so I'm planning to finally check that in and make it available for other people to start working with. If you can write a processor for your enhanced RelaxNG grammar that generates the binding definition model it'll be usable with all aspects of JiBX. The binding definition model includes pretty complete validation, so that if you can construct the model and validate it the code generation should be able to turn it into a working binding.
hi dennis,
thank you for sharing your thoughts on this issue. i'm glad that you also find this interesting.
if i can find the time, i might try to implement such a processor.
/ eitan
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
