> I've been working on some extensions to Xsd2Jibx and the core JiBX code > that support using abstract <mapping>s as the equivalent of schema > types. This doesn't allow everything I'd like to support, but at least > gives a basic level of support that looks pretty usable (and which can > be generated by Xsd2Jibx). I'm also planning to clean up as many of the > beta 3c bugs over the next couple of weeks as possible. > > At that point I'm considering making the new release 1.0 RC1, and > officially making what had been beta 4 the new first beta for JiBX 2.0. > Once people have had a chance to test the RC1 release I'll then go ahead > and make it the official first production release of JiBX.
That sounds a good idea to me. We are running the beta3 in production and I think it is a very stable and complete package. I would rather suggest to make a 1.1 version from the new beta you are releasing. Going directly from 1.0 to 2.0 is a rather big step. But definitely, JiBX deserves to move from beta to RC (or even final). ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
