i may be wrong but i don't believe your quesion makes sense in the context of jibx. jibx by definition requires a binding file.
you could write a program that introspects classes and derives a jibx binding file from them. this should be fairly straightforward / simple to implement by using a combination of introspection and dom4j.
pseudocode:
class BindingMaker
{
BindingMaker(Class cls)
{
a. use javabeans to introspect cls properties
b. write out jibx binding skeleton (<binding>) using dom4j
c. write <mapping> tag for class
d. for each property:
1. is it a primitive or string type? if so, write out a value tag
2. is it a complex type? if so, write out a structure tag and recurse on structure type
3. is it a collection type? if so, write out a collection tag, check collection type and
if a complex type then do [2]
}
}
/ eitan
On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Shishir K. Singh wrote:
Hello,
I am evaluating JiBX and came across this issue. I want to serialize an
object Graph only on the methods (get/set) and basically have no binding
definition. In other words, dump everything as it is that has a get/set
with the default object graph sructure. In this case , I won't be having
any binding definition and hence, no Binding compilation would be
needed. How can I achieve this ?
Thanks Shishir
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
