In general I recommend XMLBeans for cases where you really want to preserve the XML document structure and only work with data binding for selected pieces of the document. For instance, I think XMLBeans would be ideal for working with WSDL documents (I'd use it in JibxSoap if it wasn't so big). If you really just want to use data binding I don't think XMLBeans is a good choice (the generated object model is inflexible, conversions to/from objects are relatively slow, the memory usage is much higher due to the entire document being stored, etc.).
- Dennis
Richard Melville wrote:
Hi JiBXers,
can anyone comment on the performance and usability of JiBX versus XMLBeans? I have seen Dennis's performance evaluation on the developerworks site and I'm wondering where XMLBeans fits into the picture.
Richard
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
