you have two choices:
1. you can define the mapping for all structures in a single
mapping, nesting in the definitions for address and state,
or
2. you can define three mappings, one for each type, and
reference them.
example for #1: (just for address and state)
<binding>
<mapping name="address" class="yourpackagename.Address">
<structure name="state" field="_state">
<value name="code" field="_code" />
</structure>
</mapping>
</binding>
example for #2:
<binding>
<mapping name="address" class="yourpackagename.Address">
<structure field="_state" />
</mapping>
<mapping name="state" class="yourpackagename.State">
<value name="code" field="_code" />
</mapping>
</binding>
/ eitan
On Apr 11, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Paul Tomsic wrote:
I'm trying to set a class from an attribute, but it's
actually two steps down...
Here's my xml:
<Person name="Paul">
<Address @city="Philadelphia" @state="PA"/>
....
So my Person class contains an Address class, which
contains a State class. How would I set up the
Address class and the State class that is a field on
the Address?
Here's my classes:
public class Person {
private Address _address;
....
public class Address {
private State _state;
public class State {
private String _code;
What would my mapping look like to set the State from
that attribute?
Thanks
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
