Hi Clovis,
There's no way to handle this directly in exactly the way you've
specified it, since JiBX can't define a full (non-abstract) <mapping>
for java.* classes like Vector. If you are able to change the code
slightly you can get around this limitation by defining your own
subclass of Vector:
public class MyVector extends Vector {}
Then you can define a <mapping> for MyVector and you should be good to go.
- Dennis
Clovis Wichoski wrote:
Hi,
having the class:
public class Operation {
public String action;
public Object object;
}
the object attribute, can be any type of mapped Object, or can have a
java.util.Vector that contains many types of mapped Objects, there is
a way to map this Operation class using JiBX?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
