Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
Thomas Jones-Low wrote:
Philippe Laporte wrote:
I have only begun looking into JiBX.
The parser used is XPP3, which implements the XMLPull API. I assume
replacing XPP3 with another XMLPull parser would not be too hard.
Can anyone confirm that? Has anyone tried with kXML?
I've tried this with the Javolution (http://javolution.org/) XML
pull parser and it didn't work. Since this was a friday afternoon
project to amuse myself, I never figured out whom to blame for the API
disconnect.
The Javolution pull parser is not an implementation of XMLPull - it's
similar in functionality, but that doesn't count where compatibility is
concerned. It's using CharSequence rather than String, which I think is
a good idea - I've suggested it in the past to the XPP3 team, but they
haven't been very interested in pursuing it. The only drawback to
CharSequence is that it's strictly 1.4 and above.
My brain is slowly remembering this. I thought it would be a simple
thing to fix, but ended up digging deeper and deeper into the JiBX code,
and ultimately getting lost.
I'm not sure how much faster the Javolution parser really is, and if it
would make that much of a difference. But if someone really needs that
last bit of speed it may be an interesting idea.
--
Thomas Jones-Low Softstart Services Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] JobScheduler for Oracle
Ph: 802-398-1012 http://www.softstart.com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
