I'd suggest using something that's more document-model oriented, where
it just accepts *any* XML content and allows your code to work with it.
It's really the model that I see as the issue here. There are several
WSDL-specific object models around. The Apache Woden project
(http://incubator.apache.org/woden/) is doing one for WSDL 2.0; if they
come up with a reasonably clean model it should be possible to do a JiBX
binding to their model. I don't think you'd end up with something very
usable if you just generated a model from the schemas.
- Dennis
Tamas Hegedus wrote:
What could be an alternative to JiBX to bind a very complex xml file
(entry) to a java object?
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
I've seen this same posting on some other lists, so gather you're
trying to find whatever solution will work for this. JiBX is probably
not the best solution for working with WSDL, because of the
complexity of the WSDL structure. If you really want to go this route
you can try getting the schema for WSDL and generating Java classes
and a binding using Xsd2Jibx.
- Dennis
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
