Hello,
for a project I've been searching for a good flexible mapping from
Smalltalk objects to XML data and back. The JiBX binding mechanism
mostly fits the bill (except that the language is wrong :-) .) I have
not looked at the JiBX implementation at all, just the (excellent) website.
So I've written a rudimentary SiBX implementation whose goal is not
primarily performance but versatility. However, due to the differences
in languages (Smalltalk does not have typed variable declarations), I
will probably have to divert from the JiBX definition a little, but I
want to keep that to an absolute minimum so that the bindings I define
for Smalltalk can be used for Java with very small changes.
Up to now I have a self-referential definition (my SiBX classes can read
the binding file for SiBX and can bootstrap themselves). I expect to be
able to represent more complex bindings sometime later this week, and I
will probably have some questions by then...
Would this kind of questions be considered off-topic for this mailing
list, or is it ok?
Cheers,
Hans-Martin
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
