Hello! I wonder, why the structural attribute "allow-repeats" is limited to unordered groups!
Indeed, we use this attribute very often, because we have the usecase where a client program imports xml files (via jibx) which contain large and ordered(!) sequences of the same item type each into the same item representation (i.e. class) instance and use this item's post-set method to transfer the instance to a server-side database. We *cannot* use collections here, because of its large memory overhead in our cases (The client itself doesn't need them). Our solution leads to a quite effective block-wise data transfer and our post-set listener can use any caching strategy it likes, e.g. it can use a small buffer of only some item instances to cache them before sending the bunch to the server. The sole drawback is, that unordered reading is less effective than ordered reading. Are there any chances to extend "allow-repeats" for ordered groups? From my point of view this limitation seems rather artificial, doesn't it? Greetings from Bremen, Daniel Krügler _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
