Hi!

Is this a normal behavior that the collection of an object is null
after unmarshalling it when that collection is initialized in the
constructor?

I know that my XML in this example doesn't contain any element for
this collection but still I would like it to be initialized to an
empty collection instead of null! The logic of the code is based on
this assumption and cannot be changed!

Is it Jibx that does this afterward the constructor was called? Is
there a workaround?

Thanks

Christian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users

Reply via email to