Hi! Is this a normal behavior that the collection of an object is null after unmarshalling it when that collection is initialized in the constructor?
I know that my XML in this example doesn't contain any element for this collection but still I would like it to be initialized to an empty collection instead of null! The logic of the code is based on this assumption and cannot be changed! Is it Jibx that does this afterward the constructor was called? Is there a workaround? Thanks Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users