Robert, We send objects out over the wire using Axis2/JiBX, and marshall out to disk as straight XML also using JiBX. We aren't using jibx2wsdl, but that should not be relevant.
Below is a snippet from the mapping file: <mapping type-name="phase:PhaseQueryReturnType" class="edu.iris.ws.phasepick.PhasePickQueryReturn" abstract="true" > <structure name="IteratorInfo" field="iterator" map-as="phase:IteratorInfoType" usage="optional" /> <collection field="events" > <structure name="Event" map-as="ws:EventType" /> </collection> </mapping> <mapping name="PhaseQuery" class="edu.iris.ws.phasepick.PhasePickQueryReturn" > <!-- This mapping is used when writing the PhasePickQuery response to disk as XML. --> <collection field="events" > <structure name="Event" map-as="ws:EventType" /> </collection> </mapping> note one abstract iwth a type-name, one concrete with a name. Same class. Below is snippet of code that does the marshalling to disk. private void bindDataToXml(PhasePickQueryReturn qReturn, File outputFile) throws JiBXException, FileNotFoundException, IOException { IBindingFactory bfact = BindingDirectory.getFactory(PhasePickQueryReturn.class); IMarshallingContext mctx = bfact.createMarshallingContext(); FileOutputStream fout = new FileOutputStream(outputFile); mctx.marshalDocument(qReturn, "UTF-8", null, fout); fout.close(); } Hope this helps, Linus robert lazarski wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > I can run axis2 web services just fine - the binding compiler is > working for me. What I can't figure out is how to prevent jib2wsdl > from creating abstract mappings or marshalling with an abstract type > and a type-name. If anyone has any ideas, please help. > > Robert > > On Nov 18, 2007 7:33 PM, Nigel Charman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Robert >> >> The IMarshallable interface is added to the class file by the JiBX >> binding compiler. So long as you are running the binding compiler, the >> IMarshallable interface will be available at runtime. In the Jibx2Wsdl >> examples, search for the "bind" taskdef in the build.xml file to see an >> example of invoking the binding compiler. >> >> Cheers >> Nigel >> >> robert lazarski wrote: >> <snip> >> >>> Yet 'ExchangePermissionBO bo' doesn't implement IMarshallable. You say >>> it doesn't need to. ok, so I'm approaching this wrong. What's the >>> right way - or any way - to do this? >>> >>> Please help, >>> Robert >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> jibx-users mailing list >> jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > jibx-users mailing list > jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users