Shouldn't the inner class be mapped as a structure?
Try something more like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<binding direction="output">
<mapping class="x.y.z.Response" name="data">
<collection field="responseitems">
<structure type="x.y.z.ResponseItem">
<value field="error" name="error" usage="optional"/>
<structure field="company" name="company" usage="optional">
<structure field="xxx" name="xxx" map-as="x.y.z.Strouble"/>
.....
</structure>
</structure>
</collection>
</mapping>
<mapping class="x.y.z.Strouble" abstract="true">
<value field="d" name="d"/>
<value field="s" name="s"/>
</mapping>
</binding>
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Will Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My motivation is simple. I have different output targets for my data, some
> require formatted output, and others the raw numerical data. Some even
> require both at the same time.
>
> In theory I could use your idea of specialized getters and setters with
> built in formatting functionality. But I have hundreds of Stroubles, and it
> is very impractical to write fancy getters for all of them individually. I
> prefer to generate dumb getters automatically in Eclipse and put the logic
> in the binding file.
>
> I'm not sure that what you want to do will work since the name of a real
> getter should normally refer to the name of the field it is "gets". But I'm
> not sure about this, it may work.
>
> My issue remains. Ideas, anyone?
>
> PS When I cleaned my code to present the example above I forgot to change
> some of the instances of "test" to "xxx".
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have no insight into why this is happening, but it seems to me that
> > Strouble is asking for trouble. I don't know your motivation in wanting
> > such a class, but since it appears from your one example that there is
> > some relation between the D and the S, would it not be possible to store
> > only the double value and implement a getter for the String value in
> > terms of the stored double?
> >
> > The reason I ask you this is because I have such a class that implements
> > a TelephoneNumber. It stores it as a ten-digit string stripped of all
> > formatting, and then has a getFormatted() method that returns a
> > presentable representation. If this is not going to work with Jibx, it
> > would be good to know this before I get too far into it, and make other
> > plans.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Will Brown wrote:
> > > Hello jibbixers,
> > >
> > > here an annoying problem I need help solving.
> > >
> > > I have defined a two-field Java class called Strouble, to hold a
> > > double value and a String value. The idea is to keep both the raw data
> > > (double) and the formatted (String) representation of one floating
> > > point number in objects of this class.
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
